🔗 Share this article

A digital rights group has claimed to have scraped millions of tracks from Spotify and is getting ready to release them publicly.

Potential Impetus for Artificial Intelligence Training

Observers noted the seeming leak could aid artificial intelligence firms looking for material to train their models.

An entity called Anna’s Archive said it had scraped 86 million music files from the platform and 256 million entries of metadata such as performer and album names. The company, which carries more than 100 million tracks, confirmed that the leak did not constitute its full inventory.

“We have identified and deactivated the nefarious user accounts that engaged in unlawful scraping,” said a company spokesperson.

The Stockholm-based service, which has more than 700 million users worldwide, added that an inquiry into unauthorised access identified a third party scraped public metadata and employed questionable tactics to circumvent DRM protections.

Archive's Stated Mission and Worries

Spotify does not think the audio taken by Anna’s Archive has been released yet. Anna’s Archive, which is known for offering links to pirated books, said in a blog it wanted to create a ‘historical repository’ for music.

They claimed the audio files represented 99.6% of all music listened to by its listeners and would be distributed via ‘peer-to-peer networks’, a means of sharing large data files online.

“Naturally Spotify doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a fantastic beginning,” commented Anna’s Archive, which frames its mission as “preserving humanity’s information and heritage”.

AI Training and Intellectual Property Battleground

Ed Newton-Rex for defending artists’ copyright, remarked the leaked music would likely be used for developing AI models.

“Training on pirated material is unfortunately widespread in the tech sector, so this accessed music is almost certain to be used instructing AI models,” he said.

The group's website alludes to a large online archive, a huge online repository of copyrighted books that has reportedly been leveraged by the parent company of Facebook to develop its systems.

A founder of an artificial intelligence company wrote on the professional network that individuals of the public could in theory “build their own personal free version of the service”. He said it could also allow technology firms to “train on modern music at scale”.

Copyright has emerged as a key issue between artists, authors and content creators on one side and tech giants on the other.

Policy Proposals and Reactions

Across Britain, creative professionals have raised concerns against a ministerial suggestion to allow AI companies use copyright-protected work without consent unless the owner signals. Almost every participant to a government consultation on the idea has supported artists’ apprehensions.

The secretary of state for technology, innovation and development informed parliament this month there was “no clear consensus” on the matter, adding that ministers would “take the time to get this right”. The administration has pledged to make regulatory plans on AI and copyright by next year.